Особенности речевых способов реагирования жертв сексуального насилия с учетом интернет-общения

В статье отображены результаты проведения обзора научных исследований по речевым способам реагирования жертв сексуального насилия с учетом интернет-общения. При проведении обзора были использованы результаты научных исследований разных стран мирового сообщества, для более полного описания исследуемой темы, учитывая культуральные и межкультурные особенности разных регионов и стран. Также акцент был сделан и на других факторах, влияющих на способы реагирования жертвы насилия в речевом формате, такие как индивидуальные и психологические особенности, фактор контекста ситуации, социальные факторы. Подробно описаны последствия реагирования жертв сексуального насилия, такие как как психологическое состояние жертвы, и последствия для дальнейшего социального взаимодействия. После проведения обзора литературных данных были сделаны выводы и заключение, которые характеризуют важность проведенной исследовательской работы, для применения специалистами, оказывающих помощь, лицам перенесших сексуальное насилие.

1. Зотова Л. Э. Причины семейных конфликтов и стратегии поведения в них разнопоколенных членов семей /Л. Э. Зотова, А. А. Андреева //Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. – 2016. – №3-4 (45). – С. 67-70.

2. Макурин П. С. Причины и условия, способствующие совершению преступлений против половой неприкосновенности несовершеннолетних //Инновационная экономика и право. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 87.

3. Малкина-Пых И. Г. Виктимология. Психология поведения жертвы. – М., 2013. – 832 с.

4. Морозова С. Я не боюсь говорить о сексуальном насилии. – М.: Никея, 2018. – 101 с.

5. Островецкая Ю. А. Личность насильника, совершающего ненасильственные сексуальные посягательства в отношении несовершеннолетних //Виктимология. – 2016. – №3 (9). – С. 25.

6. Скрипченко Н. Ю. Криминологическая характеристика личности преступника, совершающего преступление против половой неприкосновенности несовершеннолетних //Журнал российского права. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 125.

7. Шульга Т. И. Работа с неблагополучной семьей: учеб. пособие /Т. И. Шульга. – М.: Дрофа, 2005. – 213 с.

8. Appel H. Intolerance of uncertainty predicts indecisiveness and safety behavior in real-life decision making: Results from an experience sampling study /H. Appel, J., Krasko, M. Luhmann //Journal of Research in Personality. – 2024. – V. 110. – 104490.

9. Aretz W. Partner search in the digital age. Psychological characteristics of online-datingservice-users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization /W. Aretz, I. Demuth, K. Schmidt //Journal of Business and Media Psychology. – 2010. – V. 1. – P. 8-16.

10. Babiarczyk B. Reporting of workplace violence towards nurses in 5 European countries – a cross-sectional study /B. Babiarczyk, A. Turbiarz, M. Tomagová //International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. – 2020. – V. 33 (3). – P. 325-338.

11. Barchielli B. When stay at Home can be dangerous: Data on domestic violence in Italy during COVID-19 Lockdown /B. Barchielli, M. Baldi, E. Paoli //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. – 2021. – V. 18 (17). – 8948.

12. Berger R. Crime in Greater Los Angeles: Experiences and Perceptions of Local Urbane Residents. Center for Criminal and Psychological Studies. – Los Angeles, 2018. – 234 p.

13. Bernard P. Perceptual determinants are crucial, but they do not explain everything: Reply to Tarrou /P. Bernard, S. J. Gervais, J. Allen // Psychological Science. – 2013. – V. 24. – P. 1071-1073.

14. Buckels E. E. Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment /E. E. Buckels, P. D. Trapnell, T. Andjelovic //Journal of Personality. – 2019. – V. 87. – P. 328-340.

15. Cantalupo N. C. A systematic look at a serial problem: Sexual harassment of students by university faculty /N. C. Cantalupo, W. C. Kidder //Utah Law Review. – 2018. – V. 1. – P. 89.

16. Chan H. C. Psycho-criminological approaches to stalking behavior: An international perspective /H. C. Chan, L. Sheridan //Crime Law and Social Change. – 2020. – V. 75 (2). – P. 11.

17. Chris C. The influence of biological and personality traits on gratifications obtained through online dating websites /C. Chris, A. David, K. Archana //Computers in Human Behavior. – 2015. – V. 49. – P. 120-129.

18. Chung, K. L. Perceptions of stalking in Malaysia and England: The influence of perpetratortarget prior relationship and personality /K. L. Chung, L. Sheridan //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2021. – V. 182. – 111064.

19. Cordellieri P. Gender differences in solving Moral dilemmas: Emotional Engagement, Care and Utilitarian Orientation /P. Cordellieri, M. Boccia, L. Piccardi //Psychological Studies. – 2020. – V. 65 (4). – P. 360-369.

20. Deborah W. Gaslighting is silent violence. How to understand that you are in the trap of a manipulator. – M.: AST, 2023. – 224 p.

21. Dehue F. Cyberbullying Research: New Perspectives and Alternative Methodologies. Introduction to the Special Issue //Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. – 2013. – V. 23. – P. 1-6.

22. Dreßing H. The prevalence and effects of stalking /H. Dreßing, P. Gass, K. Schultz //Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. – 2020. – V. 117 (20). – P. 347-353.

23. Dyar C. An experimental investigation of victim blaming in sexual assault: The roles of victim sexual orientation, coercion type, and stereotypes about bisexual women /C. Dyar, B. A. Feinstein, R. E. Anderson //J. Interpers. Violence. – 2021. – V. 36 (21-22). – P. 10793-10816.

24. Finkel E. J. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science / E. J. Finkel, P. W. Eastwick, B. R. Karney // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. – 2012. – V. 13 (1). P. 3-66.

25. Fitzgerald L. F. Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century / L. F. Fitzgerald, L. M. Cortina //APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women's private and public lives. – 2018. – V. 2. – P. 215-234.

26. Gari A. Greek students’ attitudes toward rape /A. Gari, G. Georgouleas, A. Giotsa //Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society. – 2020. – V. 16 (2). – P. 130-145.

27. Habba E., Keydar R., Bareket D. The Perfect Victim: Computational Analysis of Judicial Attitudes towards Victims of Sexual Violence //ICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. – NY, 2023. – P. 111-120.

28. Halper L. R. Feeling powerful but incompetent: Fear of negative evaluation predicts men's sexual harassment of subordinates /L. R. Halper, K.Rios // Sex Roles. – 2019. – V. 80. – P. 247-261.

29. Harvey O., Cole T., Levell J., Healy J. Explorations of attitudes towards accessibility and accessing domestic violence and abuse (DVA) perpetrator support programmes by victim-survivors and perpetrators across five European countries // Abuse. – 2024. – V. 5 (1). – P. 26-45.

30. Jiang Z. Prediction of House Price Based on The Back Propagation Neural Network in The Keras Deep Learning Framework, 2019 /Z. Jiang, G. Shen //6th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). – Shanghai, 2019. – P. 1408-1412.

31. Johnson P. A. Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine /P. A. Johnson, S. E. Widnall, F. F. Benya. – Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2018. – P. 1-6.

32. Johnston T. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation and prevention of intimate partner violence – from brain to behavior: A narrative review /T. Johnston, S. Seinfeld, C. Gonzalez-Liencres //Frontiers in Psychology. – V. 13. – 788608.

33. Kerstin S. Saying or doing human rights? A study of victim support Sweden /S. Kerstin, G. Carina //International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. – 2020. – V. 45 (1). – P. 1-12.

34. LeBreton J. M. The dark triad and workplace behavior /J. M. LeBreton, L. K. Shiverdecker, E. M. Grimaldi //Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2018. – V. 5. – P. 387-414.

35. March E. Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity /E. March, R. Grieve, J. Marrington //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2017. – V. 110. – P. 139-143.

36. Mikulincer M. Attachment orientations and emotion regulation /M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver // Current Opinion in Psychology. – 2019. – V. 25. – P. 6-10.

37. Morrison K. E. The influence of sexual orientation on attributions of blame toward victims of sexual assault /K. E. Morrison, C. L. Pedersen // J. Homosex. – 2020. – V. 67 (2). – P. 189-205.

38. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. – Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2018. – P. 1-6.

39. Oud D. How to break the cycle of unhealthy relationships /D. Oud, W. Inger //Psykopatens grep Hvordan komme fri fra helsefarlige mennesker. – M.: Alpina Publisher, 2016. – 274 p.

40. Park S. The influence of hierarchical organizational culture, supportive environment and sexual harassment on Korean women's work-to-family enrichment /S. Park, S. J. Jo, C. K. Park //European Journal of Training and Development. – 2019. – V. 43. – P. 398-414.

41. Parkhill A. J. A critical analysis of stalking theory and implications for research and practice /A. J. Parkhill, M. Nixon, T. E. McEwan //Behavioral Sciences & the Law. – 2022. – V. 40 (5). – P. 562-583.

42. Pinciotti C. M. Understanding gender differences in rape victim blaming: The power of social influence and just world beliefs /C. M. Pinciotti, H. K. Orcutt //Journal of Interpersonal Violence. – 2021. – V. 36 (1-2). – P. 255-275.

43. Roehling M. V. The effects of sexual harassment training on proximal and transfer training outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation /M. V. Roehling, D. Wu, M. G. Choi //Personnel Psychology. – 2022. – V. 75. – P. 3-31.

44. Smith K. Half of women in New Hampshire have experienced sexual harassment at work / K. Smith, S. Potter, J. Stapleton //Prevention Innovations Research Center. Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire. – 2019. – V. 54. – P. 1-4.

45. Smith T. G. Politicizing Digital Space: theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy. – London: University of Westminster Press, 2017. – P. 1-9.

46. Tang W. Y. Investigating sexual harassment in online video games: How personality and context factors are related to toxic sexual behaviors against fellow players /W. Y. Tang, F. Reer, T. Quandt // Aggressive Behavior. – 2020. – V. 46. – P. 127-135.

47. Yara O. Legal regulation of the protection of women from domestic violence in Western Europe /O. Yara, L. Golovko, O. Kapplová //Law. Human. Environment. – 2023. – V. 14 (4). – P. 79-91.

48. Zannettou S. Who let the trolls out? / S. Zannettou, T. Cauleld, W. Setzer //WebSci '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. – NY, 2019. – P. 353-362.