Development and characterization of a bioactive composite based on polylactic acid
https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6053-2026-119-2-136-145
Abstract
Aim. Development and experimental characterization of a bioactive composite based on polylactic acid, modified with hydroxyapatite and gentamicin, for implant applications.
Materials and methods. PLA-based composites were prepared by solution mixing followed by hot pressing, with variation of the hydroxyapatite content (0 40 wt. %). The microstructure and distribution of the inorganic filler were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray analysis. Mechanical properties were evaluated by three-point bending tests with determination of flexural strength and Young’s modulus in accordance with ISO 178:2019. Antimicrobial activity was assessed in vitro by the agar diffusion method against standard test strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans.
Results and discussion. The developed composite fabrication approach was shown to provide a homogeneous microstructure with a dispersed distribution of hydroxyapatite within the polymer matrix without pronounced macro-agglomeration. An increase in hydroxyapatite content resulted in a systematic decrease in flexural strength accompanied by a moderate increase in Young’s modulus, reflecting the trade-off between stiffness and resistance to bending deformations characteristic of particulate-filled polymer systems. Gentamicin-containing composites exhibited pronounced antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Conclusions. The obtained results confirm the potential of PLA-based composites modified with hydroxyapatite and gentamicin as functional biodegradable materials for implant applications in regions with moderate mechanical loading, combining mechanical support, bioactivity, and local antimicrobial protection.
About the Authors
A. A. KhrustalevaKazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
A. T. Yedrissov
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
D. P. Khrustalev
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
I. V. Chernykh
Russian Federation
390026, Ryazan c., Vysokovoltnaya str., 9
I. V. Losseva
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
A. F. Savelyev
Kazakhstan
Artyom Fedorovich Savelyev
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
V. V. Kazantsev
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
M. A. Kiikbayev
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
P. Yu. Rusyaeva
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
K. A. Perepelitsyna
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
S. V. Shapovalenko
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
References
1. World Health Organization. Musculoskeletal conditions . https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions
2. Gu D., Ou S., Liu G. Global burden of road injuries and their attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2021: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Prev. Med. Rep. 2025; 53: 103051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103051
3. Lee S. S., Du X., Kim I., Ferguson S. Matter . J. Scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering. 2022; 5 (9): 2722-2759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.003
4. Davis R., Singh A., Jackson M..J, Coelho R.T., Prakash D., Charalambous C.P., Ahmed W., da Silva L.R.R., Lawrence A.A. A comprehensive review on metallic implant biomaterials and their subtractive manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022; 120 (3-4): 1473-1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00170-022-08770-8
5. Amirtharaj Mosas K.K., Chandrasekar A.R., Dasan A., Pakseresht A., Galusek D. Recent Advancements in Materials and Coatings for Biomedical Implants. Gels . 2022; 8 (5): 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8050323
6. 6 World Health Organization. Surgical site infection. https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/infection-prevention-control/surgical-site-infection
7. Durand F., Berthelot P., Cazorla C., Farizon F., Lucht F. Smoking is a risk factor of organ/ space surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery with implant materials. Int. Orthop. 2013; 37 (4): 723727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1814-8
8. Magalhães J.M., Zambelli R., Oliveira-Júnior O., Avelar N.C.P., Polese J.C., Leopoldino A.A.O. Incidence and associated factors of surgical site infection in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery: a 7-year cohort study. Foot (Edinb). 2024; 59: 102092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2024.102092
9. Heinz N.R., Clement N.D., Young R.N., Duckworth A.D., White T.O., Molyneux S.G. Rate and factors associated with surgical site infection following aseptic revision fixation of orthopaedic trauma injuries. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2023; 33 (8): 3511-3517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-02303573-3
10. Liu H., Wang Y., Xing H., Chang Z., Pan J. Risk factors for deep surgical site infections following orthopedic trauma surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2024; 19 (1): 811. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05299-2
11. da Silva D., Kaduri M., Poley M., Adir O., Krinsky N., Shainsky-Roitman J., Schroeder A. Biocompatibility, biodegradation and excretion of polylactic acid (PLA) in medical implants and theranostic systems. Chemical Engineering Journal . 2018; 340: 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.010
12. Hussain M., Khan S. M., Shafiq M., Abbas N. A review on PLA-based biodegradable materials for biomedical applications. Giant . 2024; 18: 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giant.2024.100261
13. Yang Z., Yin G., Sun S., Xu P. Medical applications and prospects of polylactic acid materials. iScience . 2024; 27 (12): 111512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111512
14. Khrustaleva A., Khrustalev D., Yedrissov A., Rusyaeva P., Savelyev A., Kiikbayev M., Pere## Теоретическая и экспериментальная медицина pelitsyna K., Kazantsev V. Bioactive Polymer Composites for 3D-Printed Bone Implants: A Systematic Review. Polymers (Basel). 2026; 18 (3): 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18030397
15. Liu W., Cheong N., He Z., Zhang T. Application of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2025; 16 (4): 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb16040127
16. Subramaniyan M., Karuppan S., Helaili S., Ahmad I. Structural, mechanical, and in-vitro characterization of hydroxyapatite-loaded PLA composites. Journal of Molecular Structure . 2024; 1306: 137862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.137862
17. Rozis M., Evangelopoulos D.S., Pneumaticos S.G. Orthopedic Implant-Related Biofilm Pathophysiology: A Review of the Literature. Cureus . 2021; 13 (6): e15634. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15634
18. Rozis M., Evangelopoulos D.S., Pneumaticos S.G. Orthopedic Implant-Related Biofilm Pathophysiology: A Review of the Literature. Cureus . 2021; 13 (6): e15634. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15634
19. Kennedy D.G., O’Mahony A.M., Culligan E.P., O’Driscoll C.M., Ryan K.B. Strategies to Mitigate and Treat Orthopaedic Device-Associated Infections. Antibiotics (Basel) . 2022; 11 (12): 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11121822
20. 20 Mohd Ghazali F., Syahrom A. Mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone: compression and three-point bending test. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences . 2022; 18: 295-303. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v18n3.227
Review
For citations:
Khrustaleva A.A., Yedrissov A.T., Khrustalev D.P., Chernykh I.V., Losseva I.V., Savelyev A.F., Kazantsev V.V., Kiikbayev M.A., Rusyaeva P.Yu., Perepelitsyna K.A., Shapovalenko S.V. Development and characterization of a bioactive composite based on polylactic acid. Medicine and ecology. 2026;(2):136-145. https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6053-2026-119-2-136-145
JATS XML
















