Features and algorithm of preparation of qualifying scientific work in the magistracy
https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6045-2024-113-4-145-151
Abstract
Master's thesis in the system of science performs a qualifying function, i.e. it is prepared for the purpose of public defense and obtaining a scientific degree. Therefore, the compliance of such research with the basic requirements (justification of the relevance of the topic and methodological approach; correspondence of the goal, objectives and conclusions; subject and object, etc.) is fundamental in the preparation of master's theses. However, first-year master's students generally do not have basic research competencies, cannot choose and show the relevance of the topic, formulate the goal and objectives, determine the novelty and practical significance of their scientific work. In addition, having a limit time to choose and approve a relevant topic, without a pilot study, they often make a number of significant mistakes when preparing and defending their dissertation work.
The article discusses the peculiarities of preparing a qualifying research paper in the master's program using modern educational technologies and algorithms. To solve these problems, in order to effectively help the novice researcher, the authors consider it necessary to use a technological approach in the preparation of qualification work, which is useful in terms of unifying the actions of the student, ensuring the reproducibility of research steps and achieving a guaranteed result.
For this purpose, the authors have compiled and proposed, for use in classes with master's students, a step-by-step structured algorithm of actions aimed at solving research problems. And eligibility is a diagnostic indicator of the achievement of the learning goal and objectives. The developed step-by-step algorithm is used in the discipline «Technology of preparation of master's research», which is conducted for master's students of Karaganda Medical University, studying in various specialties.
About the Authors
N. U. TankibayevaKazakhstan
100008, Karaganda, Gogolya str., 40
Zh. K. Tukhmetova
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda, Gogolya str., 40
Y. E. Burdelnaya
Kazakhstan
Yelena Vyacheslavovna Burdelnaya
100008, Karaganda, Gogolya str., 40
References
1. Vikulina M. A. Tehnologii kak sposob realizacii celej inojazychnogo obrazovanija v vysshej shkole /M. A. Vikulina, O. A. Obdalova //Jazyk i kul'tura. – 2017. – №38. – S. 33.
2. Galaktionova L. V. Uchebno-metodicheskie osnovy podgotovki vypusknoj kvalifikacionnoj raboty: Ucheb. posobie /L. V. Galaktionova, A. M. Rusanov, A. V. Vasil'chenko. – Orenburg: Orenburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2014. – 98 s.
3. Gromyko V. V. Metodologija napisanija dissertacionnoj raboty / V. V. Gromyko //Vestnik RJeA im. G. V. Plehanova. – 2016. – №3. – S. 87-90.
4. Dolmatov A. V. Kreativnye metody i proektnye tehnologii v razvivajushhem obrazovanii: Uchebnik /A. V. Dolmatov, L. A. Dolmatova. – Sankt-Peterburg: Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet im. A. I. Gercena, 2023. – 328 s.
5. Kozhevnikov M. V. Metodologija i metodika nauchnogo issledovanija. Uchebnoe posobie dlja magistrantov /M. V. Kozhevnikov, N. Ju. Korneeva, I. V. Lapchinskaja – Cheljabinsk: izd-vo ZAO «Biblioteka A. Millera», 2021. – 90 s.
6. Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij. S vvodnoj stat'ej i dopolnenijami. – M.: Progress, 1977. – 300 s.
7. Muradova N. S. Magisterskaja dissertacija: osnovy podgotovki k nauchno-issledovatel'skoj dejatel'nosti: ucheb. posobie /N. S. Muradova, A. M. Mitjaeva, V. P. Chasovskih, M. P. Voronov. – Ural'skij gosudarstvennyj lesotehnicheskij universitet. – Ekaterinburg, 2018. – 186 s.
8. Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennyh obshheobjazatel'nyh standartov vysshego i poslevuzovskogo obrazovanija ot 11 ijunja 2022 goda № 917 https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2200028916 (data obrashhenija: 12.03.2023)
9. Potapov A. I. Metodicheskie ukazanija k vypolneniju vypusknoj kvalifikacionnoj raboty magistra. – SPb, 2012. – 38 s.
10. Sangadzhiev B. V. Tehnologija konstruirovanija i osushhestvlenija pedagogicheskogo processa i nekotorye pedagogicheskie tehnologii obuchenija professii jurista //Obrazovanie i pravo. – 2016. – №1. – S. 134-140.
11. Skirbekk G. Istorija filosofii /G. Skirbekk, N. Gil'e. – M.: Gumanit. izd. centr VLADOS, 2003. – 800 s.
12. Tankibaeva N. U. Technology of rational creation of scientific research. /N. U. Tankibaeva, L. E. Muravleva, A. Kiziltunch //Vestnik AGIUV. – 2017. – №3. – S. 91-95.
13. Jarskaja V. N. Metodologija dissertacionnogo issledovanija: kak zashhitit' dissertaciju. Polezno molodomu uchenomu, soiskatelju uchenoj stepeni. – Saratov: Izd. SGTU, 2011. – 176 s.
Review
For citations:
Tankibayeva N.U., Tukhmetova Zh.K., Burdelnaya Y.E. Features and algorithm of preparation of qualifying scientific work in the magistracy. Medicine and ecology. 2024;(4):145-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6045-2024-113-4-145-151