Интернеттегі қарым-қатынасты ескере отырып, жыныстық зорлық-зомбылық құрбандарының жауап беруіндегі сөйлеу тәсілдерін зерттеу

Мақалада интернеттегі қарым-қатынас ерекшеліктерін ескере отырып, жыныстық зорлық-зомбылық құрбандарының жауап беруіндегі сөйлеу тәсілдеріне арналған ғылыми зерттеулер нәтижелеріне шолу жасалынған. Шолуды жасау барысында зерттеу тақырыбын толыққанды сипаттау үшін әртүрлі аймақтар мен елдердің мәдени және мәдениетаралық ерекшеліктері ескеріле отырып, әлемдік қауымдастықтағы әртүрлі елдердің ғылыми зерттеулерінің нәтижелері пайдаланылды. Сондай-ақ зорлық-зомбылық құрбанының сөйлеу форматына әсер ететін басқа факторларға, атап айтқанда, жеке және психологиялық ерекшеліктеріне, жағдайдың айрықша және әлеуметтік факторларына да баса назар аударылған. Жыныстық зорлық-зомбылық құрбандарының жауап беру салдарлары, олардың  психологиялық жағдайы және одан кейінгі әлеуметтік өзара әрекеттесу себептері де егжей-тегжейлі сипатталған. Әдебиеттерді қарастырғаннан кейін жыныстық зорлық-зомбылықтан зардап шеккендерге көмек көрсететін мамандардың пайдалануы үшін жүргізілген зерттеу жұмыстарының маңыздылығын сипаттайтын қорытындылар жасалған.

1. Зотова Л. Э. Причины семейных конфликтов и стратегии поведения в них разнопоколенных членов семей /Л. Э. Зотова, А. А. Андреева //Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. – 2016. – №3-4 (45). – С. 67-70.

2. Макурин П. С. Причины и условия, способствующие совершению преступлений против половой неприкосновенности несовершеннолетних //Инновационная экономика и право. – 2016. – № 2. – С. 87.

3. Малкина-Пых И. Г. Виктимология. Психология поведения жертвы. – М., 2013. – 832 с.

4. Морозова С. Я не боюсь говорить о сексуальном насилии. – М.: Никея, 2018. – 101 с.

5. Островецкая Ю. А. Личность насильника, совершающего ненасильственные сексуальные посягательства в отношении несовершеннолетних //Виктимология. – 2016. – №3 (9). – С. 25.

6. Скрипченко Н. Ю. Криминологическая характеристика личности преступника, совершающего преступление против половой неприкосновенности несовершеннолетних //Журнал российского права. – 2017. – № 1. – С. 125.

7. Шульга Т. И. Работа с неблагополучной семьей: учеб. пособие /Т. И. Шульга. – М.: Дрофа, 2005. – 213 с.

8. Appel H. Intolerance of uncertainty predicts indecisiveness and safety behavior in real-life decision making: Results from an experience sampling study /H. Appel, J., Krasko, M. Luhmann //Journal of Research in Personality. – 2024. – V. 110. – 104490.

9. Aretz W. Partner search in the digital age. Psychological characteristics of online-datingservice-users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization /W. Aretz, I. Demuth, K. Schmidt //Journal of Business and Media Psychology. – 2010. – V. 1. – P. 8-16.

10. Babiarczyk B. Reporting of workplace violence towards nurses in 5 European countries – a cross-sectional study /B. Babiarczyk, A. Turbiarz, M. Tomagová //International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. – 2020. – V. 33 (3). – P. 325-338.

11. Barchielli B. When stay at Home can be dangerous: Data on domestic violence in Italy during COVID-19 Lockdown /B. Barchielli, M. Baldi, E. Paoli //International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. – 2021. – V. 18 (17). – 8948.

12. Berger R. Crime in Greater Los Angeles: Experiences and Perceptions of Local Urbane Residents. Center for Criminal and Psychological Studies. – Los Angeles, 2018. – 234 p.

13. Bernard P. Perceptual determinants are crucial, but they do not explain everything: Reply to Tarrou /P. Bernard, S. J. Gervais, J. Allen // Psychological Science. – 2013. – V. 24. – P. 1071-1073.

14. Buckels E. E. Internet trolling and everyday sadism: Parallel effects on pain perception and moral judgment /E. E. Buckels, P. D. Trapnell, T. Andjelovic //Journal of Personality. – 2019. – V. 87. – P. 328-340.

15. Cantalupo N. C. A systematic look at a serial problem: Sexual harassment of students by university faculty /N. C. Cantalupo, W. C. Kidder //Utah Law Review. – 2018. – V. 1. – P. 89.

16. Chan H. C. Psycho-criminological approaches to stalking behavior: An international perspective /H. C. Chan, L. Sheridan //Crime Law and Social Change. – 2020. – V. 75 (2). – P. 11.

17. Chris C. The influence of biological and personality traits on gratifications obtained through online dating websites /C. Chris, A. David, K. Archana //Computers in Human Behavior. – 2015. – V. 49. – P. 120-129.

18. Chung, K. L. Perceptions of stalking in Malaysia and England: The influence of perpetratortarget prior relationship and personality /K. L. Chung, L. Sheridan //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2021. – V. 182. – 111064.

19. Cordellieri P. Gender differences in solving Moral dilemmas: Emotional Engagement, Care and Utilitarian Orientation /P. Cordellieri, M. Boccia, L. Piccardi //Psychological Studies. – 2020. – V. 65 (4). – P. 360-369.

20. Deborah W. Gaslighting is silent violence. How to understand that you are in the trap of a manipulator. – M.: AST, 2023. – 224 p.

21. Dehue F. Cyberbullying Research: New Perspectives and Alternative Methodologies. Introduction to the Special Issue //Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. – 2013. – V. 23. – P. 1-6.

22. Dreßing H. The prevalence and effects of stalking /H. Dreßing, P. Gass, K. Schultz //Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. – 2020. – V. 117 (20). – P. 347-353.

23. Dyar C. An experimental investigation of victim blaming in sexual assault: The roles of victim sexual orientation, coercion type, and stereotypes about bisexual women /C. Dyar, B. A. Feinstein, R. E. Anderson //J. Interpers. Violence. – 2021. – V. 36 (21-22). – P. 10793-10816.

24. Finkel E. J. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science / E. J. Finkel, P. W. Eastwick, B. R. Karney // Psychological Science in the Public Interest. – 2012. – V. 13 (1). P. 3-66.

25. Fitzgerald L. F. Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century / L. F. Fitzgerald, L. M. Cortina //APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women's private and public lives. – 2018. – V. 2. – P. 215-234.

26. Gari A. Greek students’ attitudes toward rape /A. Gari, G. Georgouleas, A. Giotsa //Psychology: the Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society. – 2020. – V. 16 (2). – P. 130-145.

27. Habba E., Keydar R., Bareket D. The Perfect Victim: Computational Analysis of Judicial Attitudes towards Victims of Sexual Violence //ICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. – NY, 2023. – P. 111-120.

28. Halper L. R. Feeling powerful but incompetent: Fear of negative evaluation predicts men's sexual harassment of subordinates /L. R. Halper, K.Rios // Sex Roles. – 2019. – V. 80. – P. 247-261.

29. Harvey O., Cole T., Levell J., Healy J. Explorations of attitudes towards accessibility and accessing domestic violence and abuse (DVA) perpetrator support programmes by victim-survivors and perpetrators across five European countries // Abuse. – 2024. – V. 5 (1). – P. 26-45.

30. Jiang Z. Prediction of House Price Based on The Back Propagation Neural Network in The Keras Deep Learning Framework, 2019 /Z. Jiang, G. Shen //6th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI). – Shanghai, 2019. – P. 1408-1412.

31. Johnson P. A. Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine /P. A. Johnson, S. E. Widnall, F. F. Benya. – Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2018. – P. 1-6.

32. Johnston T. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation and prevention of intimate partner violence – from brain to behavior: A narrative review /T. Johnston, S. Seinfeld, C. Gonzalez-Liencres //Frontiers in Psychology. – V. 13. – 788608.

33. Kerstin S. Saying or doing human rights? A study of victim support Sweden /S. Kerstin, G. Carina //International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. – 2020. – V. 45 (1). – P. 1-12.

34. LeBreton J. M. The dark triad and workplace behavior /J. M. LeBreton, L. K. Shiverdecker, E. M. Grimaldi //Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2018. – V. 5. – P. 387-414.

35. March E. Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity /E. March, R. Grieve, J. Marrington //Personality and Individual Differences. – 2017. – V. 110. – P. 139-143.

36. Mikulincer M. Attachment orientations and emotion regulation /M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver // Current Opinion in Psychology. – 2019. – V. 25. – P. 6-10.

37. Morrison K. E. The influence of sexual orientation on attributions of blame toward victims of sexual assault /K. E. Morrison, C. L. Pedersen // J. Homosex. – 2020. – V. 67 (2). – P. 189-205.

38. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. – Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2018. – P. 1-6.

39. Oud D. How to break the cycle of unhealthy relationships /D. Oud, W. Inger //Psykopatens grep Hvordan komme fri fra helsefarlige mennesker. – M.: Alpina Publisher, 2016. – 274 p.

40. Park S. The influence of hierarchical organizational culture, supportive environment and sexual harassment on Korean women's work-to-family enrichment /S. Park, S. J. Jo, C. K. Park //European Journal of Training and Development. – 2019. – V. 43. – P. 398-414.

41. Parkhill A. J. A critical analysis of stalking theory and implications for research and practice /A. J. Parkhill, M. Nixon, T. E. McEwan //Behavioral Sciences & the Law. – 2022. – V. 40 (5). – P. 562-583.

42. Pinciotti C. M. Understanding gender differences in rape victim blaming: The power of social influence and just world beliefs /C. M. Pinciotti, H. K. Orcutt //Journal of Interpersonal Violence. – 2021. – V. 36 (1-2). – P. 255-275.

43. Roehling M. V. The effects of sexual harassment training on proximal and transfer training outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation /M. V. Roehling, D. Wu, M. G. Choi //Personnel Psychology. – 2022. – V. 75. – P. 3-31.

44. Smith K. Half of women in New Hampshire have experienced sexual harassment at work / K. Smith, S. Potter, J. Stapleton //Prevention Innovations Research Center. Carsey School of Public Policy at the University of New Hampshire. – 2019. – V. 54. – P. 1-4.

45. Smith T. G. Politicizing Digital Space: theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy. – London: University of Westminster Press, 2017. – P. 1-9.

46. Tang W. Y. Investigating sexual harassment in online video games: How personality and context factors are related to toxic sexual behaviors against fellow players /W. Y. Tang, F. Reer, T. Quandt // Aggressive Behavior. – 2020. – V. 46. – P. 127-135.

47. Yara O. Legal regulation of the protection of women from domestic violence in Western Europe /O. Yara, L. Golovko, O. Kapplová //Law. Human. Environment. – 2023. – V. 14 (4). – P. 79-91.

48. Zannettou S. Who let the trolls out? / S. Zannettou, T. Cauleld, W. Setzer //WebSci '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. – NY, 2019. – P. 353-362.