ACE2-centered longitudinal dynamics of complement and hypoxia-related biomarkers in long COVID
https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6053-2026-120-3-68-81
Abstract
Aim. To characterize the longitudinal relationships of baseline ACE2 and within-patient ACE2 change with complement components C3 and C4 and the hypoxia-related biomarker HIF-1α between 3 and 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Materials and methods. This prospective longitudinal observational study included 69 patients with paired plasma samples collected at 3 and 6 months after COVID-19. Plasma concentrations of ACE2, C3, C4, and HIF-1α were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Longitudinal changes were evaluated using paired analyses and random-intercept mixed-effects models. Secondary analyses included baseline-adjusted regression, change-score associations, Pearson and Spearman correlations, and ACE2 trajectory evaluation. Robustness was assessed using raw and log-transformed variables, influential-observation analyses, alternative trajectory thresholds, and exploratory nonlinear ACE2 models. False-discovery-rate correction was applied to prespecified hypothesis families.
Results and discussion. ACE2, C3, C4, and HIF-1α showed distinct longitudinal patterns between 3 and 6 months. Time-by-baseline-ACE2 interactions differed across the three biomarkers, with C4 showing the strongest ACE2-related signal, followed by C3 and HIF-1α. Although the linear interaction terms did not remain statistically significant after false-discovery-rate correction, complementary baseline-adjusted and change-score analyses indicated differentiated complement and hypoxia-related responses. Sensitivity analyses identified C4 as the leading candidate for a complex ACE2-associated longitudinal pattern, including evidence of nonlinearity, whereas HIF-1α showed pronounced temporal change with comparatively limited ACE2-centered association.
Conclusions. Complement and hypoxia-related biomarkers displayed distinct longitudinal behavior in relation to ACE2 during long COVID recovery. C4 showed the most prominent evidence of a potentially complex ACE2-associated pattern, while C3 and HIF-1α demonstrated different longitudinal profiles. These findings indicate that post-COVID biomarker evolution is pathway specific and cannot be fully represented by a single uniform linear ACE2-centered mechanism.
About the Authors
L. N. VajdiKazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
D. A. Klyuyev
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
O. A. Ponamareva
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda c., Gogolya str., 40
A. M. Vajdi
China
415000, Hunan Province, Changde c., Dongting Road, 3150
References
1. Nalbandian A., Sehgal K., Gupta A., et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat. Med. 2021; 27 (4): 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-02101283-z
2. Davis H.E., McCorkell L., Vogel J.M., Topol E.J. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2023; 21 (3): 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2
3. Huang C., Huang L., Wang Y., et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2023; 401 (10393): e21-e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00810-3
4. Thaweethai T., Donohue S.E., Martin J.N., et al. Long COVID trajectories in the prospectively followed RECOVER-Adult US cohort. Nature Communications. 2025; 16 (1): 9557. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65239-4
5. Evans R.A., McAuley H., Harrison E.M., et al. Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2021; 9 (11): 1275-1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00383-0
6. Lowenstein C.J., Solomon S.D. Severe COVID-19 is a microvascular disease. Circulation. 2020; 142 (17): 1609-1611. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050354.
7. Nehme M., Braillard O., Chappuis F., et al. The chronification of post-COVID condition associated with neurocognitive symptoms, functional impairment and increased healthcare utilization. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12: 14505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18673-z
8. Aid M., Boero-Teyssier V., McMahan K., et al. Long COVID involves activation of proinflammatory and immune exhaustion pathways. Nature Immunology. 2026; 27 (1): 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-025-02353-x
9. Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020; 181 (2): 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
10. Camargo S.M.R., Vuille-dit-Bille R.N., Meier C.F., Verrey F. ACE2 and gut amino acid transport. Clinical Science. 2020; 134 (21): 2823-2833. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20200477
11. Zhou P., Yang X.L., Wang X.G., et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020; 579 (7798): 270-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
12. Santos R.A.S., Sampaio W.O., Alzamora A.C., et al. The ACE2/Angiotensin-(1–7)/MAS axis of the renin-angiotensin system: focus on Angiotensin-(1–7). Physiological Reviews. 2018; 98 (1): 505-553. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2016
13. Java A., Apicelli A.J., Liszewski M.K., et al. The complement system in COVID-19: friend and foe? JCI Insight. 2020; 5 (15): e140711. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.140711
14. Risitano A.M., Mastellos D.C., Huber-Lang M., et al. Complement as a target in COVID-19? Nature Reviews Immunology. 2020; 20: 343-344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-020-0320-7
15. Ricklin D., Reis E.S., Lambris J.D. Complement in disease: a defence system turning offensive. Nature Reviews Nephrology. 2016; 12 (7): 383-401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.70
16. Semenza G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012; 148 (3): 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021
17. Palazón A., Goldrath A.W., Nizet V., Johnson R.S. HIF transcription factors, inflammation, and immunity. Immunity. 2014; 41 (4): 518-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.09.008
18. Su Y., Yuan D., Chen D.G., et al. Multiple early factors anticipate post-acute COVID-19 sequelae. Cell. 2022; 185 (5): 881-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.014
19. Doykov I., Hällqvist J., Gilmour K.C., et al. ‘The long tail of COVID-19’ – the detection of a prolonged inflammatory response after a SARSCoV-2 infection in asymptomatic and mildly affected patients. F1000Research. 2021; 9: 1349. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27287.2
20. Gao Y., Cai C., Adamo S., et al. Identification of soluble biomarkers that associate with distinct manifestations of long COVID. Nature Immunology. 2025; 26 (5): 692-705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-025-02135-5
21. Vajdi L., Klyuyev D., Ponamareva O., Kulbayeva Z., Vajdi A., Hu B. Dynamic Neuroimmune– Endothelial Network Remodeling in Long COVID: A Longitudinal Multilayer Graph Analysis. COVID. 2026; 6: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6070120
22. World Health Organization. Clinical management of COVID-19: living guideline, 18 August 2023. – Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023: 186.
23. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1995; 57 (1): 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
24. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013; 310 (20): 2191-2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
25. Yanai H., Adachi H., Hakoshima M., Katsuyama H., Sako A. The significance of endothelial dysfunction in long COVID-19 for the possible future pandemic of chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Biomolecules. 2024; 14 (8): 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14080965
26. Thomas D., Noishiki C., Gaddam S., et al. CCL2-mediated endothelial injury drives cardiac dysfunction in long COVID. Nature Cardiovascular Research. 2024; 3 (10): 1249-1265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-024-00543-8
27. Cervia-Hasler C., Brüningk S.C., Hoch T., et al. Persistent complement dysregulation with signs of thromboinflammation in active Long Covid. Science. 2024; 383 (6680): eadg7942. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7942
28. Liew F., Efstathiou C., Fontanella S., et al. Large-scale phenotyping of patients with long COVID post-hospitalization reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease. Nature Immunology. 2024; 25 (4): 607-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-024-01778-0
29. Ceglarek L., Boyman O. Immune dysregulation in long COVID. Nature Immunology. 2024; 25: 587-589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-024-01795-z
30. Notarte K.I., Catahay J.A., Velasco J.V., et al. Complement system dysregulation in the immunopathogenesis of long COVID: systematic evidence synthesis. Biomedicines. 2026; 14 (2): 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14020439
31. Baillie K., Davies H.E., Keat S.B.K., et al. Complement dysregulation is a prevalent and therapeutically amenable feature of long COVID. Med. 2024; 5 (3): 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2024.01.011
Review
For citations:
Vajdi L.N., Klyuyev D.A., Ponamareva O.A., Vajdi A.M. ACE2-centered longitudinal dynamics of complement and hypoxia-related biomarkers in long COVID. Medicine and ecology. 2026;(3):68-81. https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6053-2026-120-3-68-81
JATS XML
















