Clinical case of a bilateral ureterocele with formation of a large ureteral calculus
https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6053-2026-120-3-176-182
Abstract
In modern urological practice, anomalies of the urinary system development, such as ureterocele, often become an etiological factor for severe forms of urolithiasis. This clinical case of a 42-year-old female patient with bilateral ureterocele complicated by a large ureteral stone amidst obstructive uropathy demonstrates the capabilities of modern minimally invasive surgery in treating rare congenital pathologies in adults. In 2025, at the urological department of the SME on REM «Municipal multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2» (Astana c., Republic of Kazakhstan), a simultaneous endoscopic operation was successfully performed: bilateral laser ureterocele incision combined with contact laser lithotripsy.
The diagnostic algorithm, based on multispiral computed tomography, allowed for a detailed verification of the anatomical features of the malformation and the density of the calculus. Despite the complexity of the simultaneous intervention, the operation was characterized by minimal invasiveness and an absence of intraoperative complications. A positive clinical trend was observed in the postoperative period: complete stone destruction was achieved, adequate urodynamics were restored, and renal function was stabilized (glomerular filtration rate 86-89 mL/min/1.73 m²). The patient was discharged in satisfactory condition, confirming the high efficiency of the chosen strategy.
Analysis of this case within the context of current literature shows that simultaneous laser interventions significantly reduce the duration of inpatient treatment, minimize the anesthetic burden, and avoid staged surgeries. This approach not only reduces the risk of iatrogenic complications but also facilitates the rapid socio-occupational rehabilitation of patients. The presented clinical case emphasizes that transurethral laser ureterotomy is a safe, cost-effective, and gold standard treatment for ureterocele, providing reliable prevention of recurrent obstruction and preservation of the renal reserve.
About the Authors
Yu. G. PakKazakhstan
Z05K7M0, Astana c., T. Ryskulova str., 6
A. Mukhamedzhanuly
Kazakhstan
Z05K7M0, Astana c., T. Ryskulova str., 6
E. S. Bekmuratov
Kazakhstan
Z05K7M0, Astana c., T. Ryskulova str., 6
K. T. Beisenov
Kazakhstan
010000, Astana c., Beibitshilik str., 49a
E. A. Sharapatov
Kazakhstan
010000, Astana c., Beibitshilik str., 49a
N. E. Abdikhaliyev
Kazakhstan
Nurislam Abdikhaliyev
010000, Astana c., Beibitshilik str., 49a
References
1. Ghanem K., Leslie S.W., Badreldin A.M. Ureterocele. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK597362/
2. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis/chapter/guidelines
3. Atta O.N., Alhawari H.H., Murshidi M.M., Tarawneh E., Murshidi M.M. An adult ureterocele complicated by a large stone: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case. Rep. 2018; 44: 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.02.035
4. Shokeir A.A., Nijman J.M. Ureterocele: an ongoing challenge in infancy and childhood. BJU International. 2002; 90: 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2002.02998.x
5. Gnech M., Bebi C., Rotondi G., Thomas E., Minoli D.G., De Marco E.A., Mitzman F., Santangelo E., Fanti F., Manzoni G., Berrettini A. Endoscopic incision of ureterocele. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2024; 20 (6): 1221-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.09.010
6. Gupta R., Gupta S., Khan D., Basu S. Bilateral Single System Orthotopic Ureterocele with Bilateral Multiple Calculi Presented with Retention of Urine - an Urological Emergency. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017; 11 (7): PD01-PD02. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/28054.10134
7. Somani B.K., Giusti G., Sun Y., Osther P.J., Frank M., De Sio M., Turna B., de la Rosette J. Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) related to treatment of urolithiasis: the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study. World J. Urol. 2017; 35 (4): 675-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0
8. Türk C., Petřík A., Sarica K., Seitz C., Skolarikos A., Straub M., Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 2016; 69 (3): 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
9. Schultza K., Todab L.Y. Genetic Basis of Ureterocele. Curr. Genomics. 2016; 17 (1): 62-69. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202916666151014222815
10. Borchert D., Sheridan L., Papatsoris A., Faruquz Z., Barua J.M., Junaid I., Pati Y., Chinegwundoh F., Buchholz N. Prevention and treatment of urinary tract infection with probiotics: Review and research perspective. Indian J. Urol. 2008; 24 (2): 139-144. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.40604
11. Timberlake M.D. Corbett S.T. Minimally Invasive Techniques for Management of the Ureterocele and Ectopic Ureter: Upper Tract Versus Lower Tract Approach. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2014; 42 (1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2014.09.006
12. Abedi A.R., Razzaghi M., Montazeri S., Allameh F. The Trends of Urolithiasis Therapeutic Interventions over the Last 20 Years: A Bibliographic Study. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2021; 12: e14. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2021.14
Review
For citations:
Pak Yu.G., Mukhamedzhanuly A., Bekmuratov E.S., Beisenov K.T., Sharapatov E.A., Abdikhaliyev N.E. Clinical case of a bilateral ureterocele with formation of a large ureteral calculus. Medicine and ecology. 2026;(3):176-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.59598/ME-2305-6053-2026-120-3-176-182
JATS XML
















