ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ЛУЧЕВЫХ МЕТОДОВ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ И ПРОГНОЗЕ ОСТРОГО ПАНКРЕАТИТА И ЕГО ОСЛОЖНЕНИЙ
Аннотация
В современной панкреатологии проблема диагностики острого панкреатита является одной из наиболее сложных и актуальных. Применение современных методов лучевой диагностики у больных острым панкреатитом и панкреонекрозом позволяет определить форму болезни и выявить ее осложнения. В настоящей статье представлен анализ данных литературы по диагностике и прогнозу течения панкреатита и уточнение роли ультразвукового исследования и компьютерной томографии как основных методов диагностики, их значение в планировании лечебной тактики у больных острым панкреатитом.
Об авторах
М. А. ЕрмековаКазахстан
М. Т. Алиякпаров
Казахстан
В. М. Черемисин
Россия
К. Т. Шакеев
Казахстан
И. Г. Камышанская
Россия
Список литературы
1. Абдурахманов Р. Ф. Диагностика и хирургическая коррекция заболеваний поджелудочной железы у военнослужащих и лиц молодого возраста: Автореф. дис..канд. мед. наук. - Алматы, 2015. - 22 с.
2. Белобородова Ю. С.Значение методов лучевой визуализации в диагностическом алгоритме при остром панкреатите /Ю. С. Белобородова, Ю. С. Винник, А. А. Белобородов, Е. П. Данилина //Сиб. мед. обозрение. - 2014. -№1. - С. 66-70.
3. Лучевая диагностика и терапия. Общая лучевая диагностика /Под ред. С. К. Терновой.- М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2014.- Т. 1.- 232 с.
4. Скутова В. А. Острый панкреатит - актуальные вопросы диагностики и комплексного лечения /В. А. Скутова, А. И. Данилов, Ж. А. Феокистова //Вестник СГМА. - 2016. - №2. -С. 78-84.
5. A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis /T. L. Bollen, V. K. Singh, R. Maurer et al. //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2012. - V. 107. - P. 612-619.
6. A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis /T. L. Bollen, V. K. Singh, R. Maurer et al. //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2012. - V. 107. - P. 612-619.
7. A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome /K. J. Mortele, W. Wiesner, L. Intriere et al. //AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. - 2004. -V. 183.- P. 1261-1265.
8. Acute pancreatitis: interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome /R. Lecesne, P. Taourel, P. M. Bret et al. //Radiology. - 1999. - V. 211. - P. 727-735.
9. Acute pancreatitis: updates in classification system /N. M. Grekova, A. G. Bukhvalov, Y. V. Lebedeva, S. A. Bukhvalova //Modern problems of science and education. - 2015. - №3. - P. 67-69.
10. Added value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of pancreatic fluid collection infection /B. Borens, M. Arvanitakis, J. Absil et al. //Eur. Radiol. - 2017. -V. 27. - P. 1064-1073.
11. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines: management of acute pancreatitis /S. Tenner, J. Baillie, J. DeWitt et al. //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2013. - V. 108. - P. 1400-1415.
12. Association between severity and the Determinant-Based Classification, Atlanta 2012 and Atlanta 1992, in acute pancreatitis. A clinical retrospective study /Y. Chen, L. Ke, Z. Tong et al. //Medicine. - 2015. - V. 94. - P. 1-7.
13. Atlanta, revised Atlanta, and Determinant-based classification-application in a cohort of Portuguese patients with acute pancreatitis /S. R. Fernandes, J. Carvalho, P. Santos et al. //Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2016. - V. 28. - P. 20-24.
14. Banks P. A. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus //P. A. Banks, T. L. Bollen, C. Dervenis //Gut. - 2013. -V. 62. - Р. 102-111.
15. Bollen T. L. Acute pancreatitis: international classification and nomenclature //Clin. Radiol. - 2016. - V. 71. - P. 121-133.
16. Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States /a. F. Peery, S. D. Crockett, A. S. Barritt et al. // Gastroenterology. - 2015. - V. 149. - P. 17311741.
17. Byrne K. R. Cannulation of the major and minor papilla via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Techniques and outcomes /K. R. Byrne, G. A. Douglas //Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2012. - V. 14, №3. - P. 135-140.
18. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis? /Q. Lu, Y. Zhong, X. R Wen. et al. //Dig. Dis. Sci. - 2011. -V. 56. - P.1578-1584.
19. Comparative evaluation of the modified CT severity index and CT severity index in assessing severity of acute pancreatitis /T. L. Bollen, V. K. Singh, R. Maurer et al. //AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. - 2011. - V. 197. - P. 386-392.
20. Comparison of abdominal ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of necrotic debris in walled-off pancreatic necrosis /S. S. Rana, V. Chaudhary, R. Sharma et al. //Gastroenterol. Rep. - 2016. -V. 4. - P. 50-53.
21. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the staging of acute pancreatitis /T. Ripolles, M. J. Martinez, E. Lopez et al. //Eur. Radiol. - 2010. - V. 20. - P. 2518-2523.
22. CT and MRI assessment of symptomatic organized pancreatic fluid collections and pancreatic duct disruption: an interreader variability study using the revised Atlanta classification 2012 /A. Kamal, V. K. Singh, V. S. Akshintala et al. //Abdom. Imaging. - 2015. - V. 40. - P. 16081616.
23. Dachs R. J. Does early ED CT scanning of afebrile patients with first episodes of acute pancreatitis ever change management? /R. J. Dachs, L Sullivan., P. Shanmugathasan //Emerg. Radiol. - 2015. - V. 22. - P. 239-243.
24. Debridement and closed packing for sterile or infected necrotizing pancreatitis: insights into indications and outcomes in 167 patients /J. R., Rodriguez, A. O. Razo, J. Targarona et al. //Ann. Surg. - 2008. - V. 247. - P. 294299.
25. Do the morphological features of walled off pancreatic necrosis on endoscopic ultrasound determine the outcome of endoscopic transmural drainage? /S. S. Rana, D. K. Bhasin, R. K. Sharma et al. //Endosc. Ultrasound. - 2014. - V. 3. - P. 118-122.
26. Dynamic measurement of disease activity in acute pancreatitis: the pancreatitis activity scoring system /B. U. Wu, M. Batech, M. Quezada et al. //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2017. - V. 112. -P. 1144-1152.
27. Echo enhanced ultrasound: a new valid initial imaging approach for severe acute pancreatitis /S. Rickes, C. Uhle, S. Kahl et al. //Gut. -2006. - V. 55. - P. 74-78.
28. Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines /M. Arvanitakis, J.-M. Dumonceau, J. Albert, A. Badaoui //Endoscopy. -2018. - V. 50 (05). - P. 524-546.
29. Forsmark C. E. AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis /C. E. Forsmark, J. Baillie //Gastroenterology. - 2007. - V. 132. - P. 2022-2044.
30. Gillams A. R. Diagnosis of duct disruption and assessment of pancreatic leak with dynamic secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography /A. R. Gillams, T. Kurzawinski, W. R. Lees //Ajr Am. J. Roentgenol. - 2006. - V. 186. - P. 499-506.
31. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis /M. Besselink, H. van Santvoort, M. Freeman et al. // Pancreatology. - 2013. - V. 13. - e1-e15.
32. Mortele K. J. Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital-analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes /K. J. Mortele, I. K. Ip, B. U. Wu // Radiology. - 2011. - V. 258. - P. 174-181.
33. Nawaz H. Revised Atlanta and determinant-based classification: application in a prospective cohort of acute pancreatitis patients /H. Nawaz, R. Mounzer, D. Yadav //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2013. - V. 108. - P. 1911-1917.
34. Non-invasive detection of infection in acute pancreatic and acute necrotic collections with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary findings /F. Islim, A. E. Salik, S. Bayramoglu et al. //Abdom. Imaging. - 2014. - V. 39. - P. 472-481.
35. Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention: evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US /D. E. Morgan, T. H. Baron, J. K. Smith et al. //Radiology. - 1997. - V. 203. - P. 773-778.
36. Performance of the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classification for severity in acute pancreatitis /S. S. Bansal, J. Hodson, R. S. Sutcliffe //Br. J. Surg. - 2016. - V. 103. - P. 427433.
37. Prospective evaluation of nonenhanced MR imaging in acute pancreatitis /L. Viremouneix, O. Monneuse, G. Gautier et al. //J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. - 2007. - V. 26. - P. 331-338.
38. Prospective validation of 4-category classification of acute pancreatitis severity /R. B. Thandassery, T. D. Yadav, U. Dutta et al. // Pancreas. - 2013. - V. 42. - P. 392-396.
39. Raja A. S. Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades /A. S. Raja, K. J. Mortele, R. Hanson // Int. J. Emerg. Med. - 2011. - V. 4. - P. 19.
40. Spanier B. W. M. Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch Observational Multicenter Study /B. W. M. Spanier, Y. Nio, R. W. M. van der Hulst //Pancreatology. -2010. - V. 10. - P. 222-228.
41. Stevens T. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute and chronic pancreatitis //Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. North Amer. - 2013. - V. 23, №4. - P. 735-747.
42. Tenner S. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis /S. Tenner, J. Baillie, J. DeWitt //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2013. - V. 108. - P. 1400-1416.
43. The Atlanta classification, revised Atlanta classification, and determinant-based classification of acute pancreatitis. Which is best at stratifying outcomes? /V. Kadiyala, S. L. Suleiman, J. McNabb-Baltar //Pancreas. - 2016. - V. 45. - P. 510-515.
44. The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis /D. Stimac, D. Miletic, M. Radic et al. //Am. J. Gastroenterol. - 2007. - V. 102. - P. 997-1004.
45. The role of routine fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of infected necrotizing pancreatitis /M. C. van Baal, T. C. Bollen, O. J. Bakker et al. //Surgery. - 2014.- V. 155.- P. 442-448.
46. The value of procalcitonin at predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and development of infected pancreatic necrosis: systematic review /R. Mofidi, S. Suttie, P. V. Patil et al. // Surgery. - 2009. - V. 146. - P. 72-81.
47. Thoeni R. F. The revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis: its importance for the radiologist and its effect on treatment // Radiology. - 2012. - V. 262. - P. 751-764.
48. Validation of the determinant-based classification and revision of the Atlanta classification systems for acute pancreatitis /N. G. Aceve-do-Piedra, N. Moya-Hoyo, M. Rey-Riveiro et al. // Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2014. - V. 12. - P. 311-316.
49. Wu B. U. Clinical management of patients with acutepancreatitis /B. U. Wu, P. A. Banks //Gastroenterology. - 2013. - V. 144. - P. 1272-1281.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Ермекова М.А., Алиякпаров М.Т., Черемисин В.М., Шакеев К.Т., Камышанская И.Г. ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ЛУЧЕВЫХ МЕТОДОВ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ И ПРОГНОЗЕ ОСТРОГО ПАНКРЕАТИТА И ЕГО ОСЛОЖНЕНИЙ. Медицина и экология. 2019;(1):80-91.
For citation:
Yermekova M.A., Ahyakparov M.T., Cheremisirf' V.M., Shakeyev K.T., Kamyshanskaya I.G. OPPORTUNITIES OF X-RAY METHODS IN DIAGNOSTICS AND FORECAST OF ACUTE PANCREATITIS AND ITS COMPLICATIONS. Medicine and ecology. 2019;(1):80-91. (In Russ.)